Mobius Encyclopaedia
Advertisement

Omega introduction

Any thoughts on how E-123 Omega will appear? How he'll differ from his game counterpart? And what abilities he may have?Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Omega construction

Please post any suggestions on how to improve this article here.Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Omega Pictures

I'm on your page adding images and stuff!User talk:Duuz 1:10, 22 April 2009

I don't mind, and thanks for adding them.Fairfieldfencer FFF 18:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Omega Number

If Alpha's's the first of the E-100 series robot's, then doesn't that mean Gamma's the third and Omega's actually the twenty-fourth? Sen10elS 17:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

It is a touch confusing, but Eggman himself stated that Gamma was the second (I think, the comic adaption maybe different from the games), and Ian stated Omega was the 123rd. [1] We have to go by the canon policy of this website, and simply list the mistake in the background information section.Fairfieldfencer FFF 17:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I never played any of the games Omega was in so bear with me- since he's an E-100 series robot, shouldn't the 1 in his codename stand for that? If he's really #123, it makes more sense for his designation to be E-1123 Omega.Sen10elS 20:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

By game I meant Sonic Adventure. As for your above post, like I said before. We go by his canon name. The whole thing is a big mess really. Hopefully, the Sonic Encyclopaedia will be able to clear this up.Fairfieldfencer FFF 20:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Gamma was the second all right. I remember issue 82. Perhaps someone counted each of the E-105 Series individually, and saw that there were roughly 100. Good thing Eggman has been sharp as a bowling ball lately (comic and game). How many E-121 Phi units did Eggman build in Sonic Battle again? And there were at least two ZERO units in issue 81. Gazordenplatt 22:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Advertisement