User talk:Sen10elS

Hi, welcome to Mobius Encyclopaedia! Thanks for your edit to the Image:MechaSonic.jpg page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Fairfieldfencer (Talk) 02:07, 12 April 2009

New Messages
You have new messages at Talk:E-123 Omega.Fair field fencer F F F  17:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for uploading the image for me. I'll handle the others.Fair field fencer F F F  15:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Problem was there was already an article named Marvelous Queen. I had to delete it first to make way for the move. If that happens to you again before you're an admin, just move the info manually instead.Fair field fencer F <font color="#FFA500">F <font color="#FF2400">F  10:58, December 14, 2010 (UTC)

Uploading Images
Hey there, thanks for uploading some high quality scans. I just wanted to say that when you upload images, you must include the Non-free use rationale and fill out all the fields. I did it for the images you uploaded this time, just be sure to remember to add it in the future. You can find the rationale template here. - Dimitri the Echidna 22:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Small Favour
Could you do me a small favour that will only take a minute of your time and no need to bother doing anything at all? You created the Lost Temple of Shazamazon article not too long ago, correct? Could you, from memory, describe what the interior of the temple looks like? Don't bother looking through your old issues, I wouldn't want you to go through too much trouble. Just something from memory will do. Thank you for your time.<font color="#FF2400">Fair <font color="#FFA500">field <font color="#FF2400">fencer <font color="FF2400">F <font color="#FFA500">F <font color="#FF2400">F  12:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Title Puns
Hey there, very nice punderful titles you came up with there. I'll admit though, "Sol Sisters" is kinda iffy and probably should be replaced with something else, but I do like the "Sol Searching" one though. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:46, October 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I dunno, just a bit of an oddity, I suppose. But still, they're great titles, and I got a nice chuckle out of them. Keep up the good work! <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:58, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

* Slaps you high-five.*<font color="#FF2400">Fair <font color="#FFA500">field <font color="#FF2400">fencer <font color="FF2400">F <font color="#FFA500">F <font color="#FF2400">F  21:59, November 22, 2010 (UTC)

Article of the Week
Hey there, good choice on the new Article of the Week! I'm putting it up on the main page now. Check it out later! <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:34, April 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey there, sorry this is a bit late, but nice "Easter Egg" reference for the candidate selection of the Article of the Week for this holiday. Hope you had a Happy Easter! <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:44, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I did! Hope you did too! Gotta admit though, it didn't even dawn on me that I might be making an Easter reference when I did that. More of a happy accident really. Glad you like it anyway! On a related note, maybe it's still a bit early to think about this, but the overall lack of participation from others for the past four weeks is making me wonder if the voting system will really work? Sen10elS 11:40, April 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * While I do question the voting system myself, I think there's still some chance of it working. The problem is that either people are unaware of the system, or they just plain don't care about the Article of the Week. I too am sorry that I only had the chance to second your choices once. Even I am trying to think of some articles that could be worthy for Article of the Week. In all, I say we should just wait and see if anyone else actually contributes. What do you think, Arbiter? Lcemmcr 04:01, April 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I have noticed that there has been hardly any participation on this system that I created. However, I did put up a notice on the main page, as well as update the candidates page, but I guess hardly anybody reads those anymore. Still, for now, the system stays until a better one comes along (if you and/or Lcemmcr have another idea on this, let me know on my talkpage). As I've stated before in my notice, I'm out of good choices for any future Articles of the Week until much later on, and I've been wanting to put the candidates page back in full swing for some time now, and this was the best way I could think of for right now. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    11:38, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Reply to question
Hey there, sorry it took me so long to get back to you, been in Yorktown all week for work.

Anyway, in regards to your question, if you mean the creation of the comic articles which was what the subheading was about and Dimitri's (a.k.a. Thot Prad's) response, that has been done a long time ago when this wiki expanded to include those comic articles back in early 2009.

If you mean comic summaries in general, I did create quite a few early on (#160, #161, #184, and #199, to name a few), as well as correct several others, until user CrazyLea took over and she has been doing an outstanding job making those summaries for the newer issues since issue #208.

If you mean the project I started on late last year in regards to the sloppy comic summaries created by some of those users, that has been put on hiatus right now (any user is free to take this task if they want) due to my increasing workload at my job.

Well, I hope one of these answers is the one you want to know, and if you have any other questions or concerns, post them on my talkpage. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    01:33, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Hey there, in response to your question on those blog entries, no, I believe they do not warrant actual articles, seeing as they did not appear in the comic itself, and the images used were recycled from older comic issues. In fact, I'm not sure how "canon" those blog entries really are. I ought to ask Ian Flynn about that one of these days. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    01:27, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

It's done. Thanks for reporting this to me. I'm definitely going to need some help fixing these articles, though... <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    19:40, June 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * More than likely it is the same person switching IP addresses when one of them gets blocked, but the theory also exists that this spammer has some friends helping him vandalize this wiki as well as others. Anyway, congratulations on your promotion and with you and Merricks helping out, I'm sure we can hold off those vandals and keep this wiki spam-free. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    20:08, June 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * If you mean that the articles in question are loaded with too many images in relation to said article, then yes, that would be a small infraction of the Manual of Style. A general rule of thumb would be to put one image per paragraph (if the paragraph is sufficently big enough) and move it to the appropriate side, as well as make sure the image isn't too big (around 100-200 px for your average image). <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:40, June 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * EDIT: Sorry, half asleep here. You meant the modified character images that have no background, correct? Those are fine ONLY if they are to be used as the main image for the character article. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:48, June 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I see what you mean. Tell Chubzac to fix the articles he/she wrote in present tense and to not add any more information in any more articles until he/she fixes said articles. Also, give the user a deadline to get it done at your discretion and if it isn't done, revert his/her edits. But if Chubzac ignores your warning again and continues to contribute against the Manual of Style, give him/her a two-week ban (my recommendation, but you can set the ban time at your discretion as well). <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    02:38, July 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * UPDATE: Never mind. I already issued a final warning to Chubzac and dictated the terms. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva"> Arbiter   <font color="#191970" face="monotype corsiva">  0416    03:13, July 6, 2011 (UTC)

Gala-Na Picture
Nice work on finding that edited Gala-Na picture from the blogs. I have been going through the blogs looking for good pictures, and I didn't even notice that one! Did you find any other ones that can most likely be used? Diamonddeath 03:17, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Not yet. It just always bugged me how she and Yanar were bltatantly miscolored during that story arc... then again, a lot of things about the whole story in general bothered me. That was really the first image that came to mind and inspired hope in me for the archive reprints. With any luck there may be more on the way. Sen10elS 02:11, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Prelates
I like the idea that you had for the information on the prelates, but I'm not sure if that rabbit is Cream. I was thinking that maybe it was Jack Rabbit or Mach the Rabbit, but this is an alternate future. What do you think? Diamonddeath 07:00, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Of the two images with rabbit prelates, the one with the Big prelate has Cream's main color so it seems likely to be her. The other one is a lighter color so it could be Scarlette or maybe Vanilla. I doubt its Mach since he's pink, nor Jack since the Jack we know has an eyepatch like Demo and that feature was evident with Demo's prelate form. Sen10elS 15:42, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Sen: I've read Sonic Universe # 28 several times. Scarlette has the same cream-colored fur. And I'm also sure the prelate rabbit on the splash page and the one in the Big prelate panel are indeed the same prelate. Please stop changing my edits. Thank you.

P.S. If you have any problems, ask Ian Flynn.

One- Sorry, but I will not stop reverting edits to pages that I feel justified in finding to be incorrect. The rabbit prelate on the splash page that I am looking at RIGHT NOW, has light yellow color to it; it might be Scarlette, it mightt be Vanilla, it might be neither, we cannot tell for sure and may never know. HOWEVER, the rabbit Prelate in the same panel as the Big prelate has a more tan-orangish color tone, which is distinctly different from the one in the splash page. THAT is fact. What can be reasonably speculated is that it is Cream based on that color, its height compared to the other prelates in that panel, AND the fact that the Amy prelate is there too, which would make for a delightful easter egg to see all of the sweet and cuddly Team Rose as soul-less killer robots. In addition to that, the fourth prelate in that panel has an eye that matches the color of Cutlass' core and has rather Antoine-like facial features, from which it is highly probable to believe that it Cutlass since there was indeed a Demo prelate earlier.

TWO- If you feel you should be so invested in the quality of this page, then might I suggest you register on this sight as an actual user so you can have a signature to leave behind on all of your talkpage posts, and I might have some idea of whom I am addressing? Sen10elS 02:15, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Um, yeah. I have a problem with my e-mail. (Apparently, only one website recognized it.) I actually didn't notice the Cutlass prelate there until you mentioned it. However, I have a problem with me believing that the prelate on the splash page is indeed Cream. Either way, one of the prelates HAS to be Scarlette.

FYI, I loved the Silver Arc. Silver is my favorite hedgehog by far. (I also love Ray, but he's a flying squirrel.)

\Love, Gia-Na

Gia-Na again. BTW, if that WAS Cream, wouldn't her ears be pointing down?

I just had a PM with Ian on Bumbleking. He says he let Tracey decide who to make into Prelates and feels it should be pretty obvious that the rabbit Prelate is indeed Cream, so there. Settled. Sen10elS 05:16, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

I guess I stand corrected then.

Love, Gia-Na

You're Welcome
Happy to help. Did not want kids who visit this wiki to see that sick stuff. Merricks 21:29, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations, you've been promoted
Sen10elS, in light of your daily contributions, your help in dealing with the recent spam attacks, in addition to Arbiter0416's recommendation, I have made you a site administrator on Mobius Encyclopaedia. It's a big job, and this site could use some tidying up, as I've been so busy the past year and a half I haven't been able to do as much up-keep on it as I would like. More than anything I want to see the articles meet the Manual of Style's criteria, and many of them to not (i.e. a lot of them are needlessly wordy). You can check out how to used the various administrative tools here. Let me know if you need any help. Congratulations. - Dimitri the Echidna 17:24, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for banning this user. It is hard to undo the damage while he/she messes up new articles just as fast.

Unfortunately Thot only gave me rollback ability and I also can't stay on here because of finals. We need to spread the word for some more help if possible.Merricks 12:27, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Welcome
Thanks so much! The Manual of Style answered most of my questions, so I just have one question left - am I allowed to upload Fanart that I drew as long as I put it in a Fanart page category? Thanks again for your help! ~Walla-Walla-Wallabee! &lt;3 19:43, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

Understood, thank you very much! ~Walla-Walla-Wallabee! &lt;3 03:18, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
I accidently made a mistake on the sally acorn pageChubzhac 20:07, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

I am telling you 3 more things ok? 1 my grammer is NOT bad I am just lazy lol and used to spelling like this on the internet 2 I am not trying to fight so don't get angrey please 3 the thing that said sonic was currently dating sally was there before and you ddint get mad it was there before it was

Re: Summaries
I really have no idea what you're talking about. Could you give me some examples, and are you sure it was something that I did and not someone else? Diamonddeath 03:56, July 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * I went back and tried fixing up the articles. I think I know what you were referring to, but it was probably because I was editing them really early in the morning, so sorry about that. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. Diamonddeath 04:32, July 11, 2011 (UTC)